The Power Play of ‘Let Me Finish’: Strategies to Foster Open Dialogue

Increasingly often I hear conversations being interrupted by one of the participants demanding attention and closing down communication by using the power play phrase of “let me finish” abruptly and aggressively. Let’s explore the ramifications of this bullying technique and some countermeasures to open a more effective dialogue.
The phrase “let me finish” is typically used as a tool to assert dominance in conversations, effectively quashing debate and stifling the exchange of ideas. While it may seem like a simple request for uninterrupted speaking time, its implications are far-reaching and can have a chilling effect on open dialogue.
At its core, the command “let me finish” prioritizes one person’s voice over another’s. It implies that the speaker’s thoughts are more important and deserving of attention than those of the listener. This creates an imbalance in the conversation, where one party feels silenced and undervalued. In a debate setting, this phrase can be particularly damaging, as it disrupts the natural flow of back-and-forth discussion that is essential for exploring different perspectives and reaching a deeper understanding.
Moreover, the use of “let me finish” signals a lack of willingness to engage with opposing viewpoints. It suggests that the speaker is more interested in delivering their monologue than in participating in a genuine exchange of ideas. This leads to a breakdown in communication, where both parties become entrenched in their positions and less open to considering alternative perspectives.
In addition, “let me finish” represents a tactic to avoid addressing challenging questions or criticisms. By insisting on uninterrupted speaking time, the speaker can sidestep difficult topics and steer the conversation in a direction that is more comfortable for them. This often prevents meaningful dialogue and hinders the process of critical thinking and problem-solving.
Effective Countermeasures
Counteracting the phrase “let me finish” requires a blend of assertiveness, empathy, and strategic communication. Here are some techniques to help maintain a balanced and respectful dialogue:
1.Active Listening: Show a genuine interest in what the other person is saying. Nod, make eye contact, and provide verbal affirmations like “I understand” or “That’s interesting.” This can make the speaker feel heard and reduce their need to assert dominance.
2.Paraphrasing: After the speaker has made their point, paraphrase what they said to show that you have understood their perspective. For example, “So, what you’re saying is…” This demonstrates that you are engaged and can help to de-escalate any tension.
3.Interjecting Politely: If you need to interrupt, do so politely. Use phrases like “I appreciate your point, but I would like to add…” or “Can I quickly share my thoughts on this?” This shows respect for the speaker while also asserting your right to contribute.
4. Setting Ground Rules: In a formal debate or meeting, establish ground rules for speaking time and interruptions. This ensures that everyone has an equal opportunity to speak and prevents any one person from dominating the conversation.
5. Using Non-Verbal Cues: Sometimes, non-verbal cues like raising your hand or leaning forward can signal that you have something to say without interrupting the speaker. This can be a subtle way to indicate your desire to contribute.
6.Addressing the Behavior: If the phrase “let me finish” is being used repeatedly to dominate the conversation, address it directly but respectfully. For example, “I notice that you often ask to finish your point, and I want to make sure we both have a chance to share our thoughts.”
7.Staying Calm: Maintain a calm and composed demeanor, even if the conversation becomes heated. This can help to de-escalate the situation and encourage a more productive dialogue.
By employing these techniques, you can help to create a more balanced and respectful conversation, ensuring that all voices are heard and valued.
Closing Thoughts
The phrase “let me finish” can have a stifling effect on debate, limiting the opportunity for open and honest communication. To foster a more inclusive and productive dialogue, it is important to recognize the power dynamics at play in conversations and strive for a more balanced and respectful exchange of ideas. This means being mindful of how we use language and making a conscious effort to listen actively and engage with others’ viewpoints, rather than simply asserting our own.
Disaster Communications

Hurricane Helene hit my hometown of St. Petersburg, Florida as well as much of the Gulf Coast, with a record storm surge. Power in my neighborhood was down for four days and is still being repaired. Our utility provider was prepared and ready to jump on the issues with hundreds, if not thousands, of technicians to get on the remediation actions. Well, done!
We had access to an outage portal to report against and watch progress, sort of. We had numbers to call for updates, sort of. We got SMS updates on progress, sort of. The key here is sort of. All the pieces are in place to communicate to ratepayers effectively again I say well, done.
Despite the readiness of the utility to respond and communicate I felt the result was anemic. The first status update on my neighborhood for power to return was 36 hours post event, cool. Well, that estimate passed and nothing was updated until about 24 hour later that power would be restored in about 6 hours, how exciting. Yet another estimate was inaccurate and the following day there were no updates. So basically, after the last update which was about 60 hours past the first update there had been no additional updates. I called customer service; they had no additional information other than the portal’s stale estimate. Hmm…no update, no trucks in the area, no power, no hope.
Miraculously, 96 hours after the initial estimate had passed, we had trucks in the neighborhood. The portal status update remained stale. Were these big trucks just visiting? I don’t know.
Without power the neighborhood went old school, people walking around asking each other what they knew. We all knew the exact same information, absolutely nothing current. Being the proactive dude I am I asked the crew lead about their assignment. He was clear, they were sent to evaluate the issues and remediate. Any timing update? Nope! They could fix the problems but had no control over energizing the power. OK then. Still no change in status on the portal or an SMS update. Hmm…
Finally, with no warning over100 hours past the stale update we had power. Amen!! Thank you, Mr. Utility Man.
Recommendations for Utilities
Customer experience management is my primary competency, I’ve been working with businesses to improve their customer experience for near 30 years. I could not have been more disappointed with my utilities and their ratepayer communication during this disaster. It was a big fat ZERO on a ten-point scale. There was not one piece of useful information available during the outage other than we were in an outage area, already knew that piece.
Tips for Utilities
- Use the tools you have. Have your teams update status for ratepayers at reliable intervals. Even it there isn’t a change in status. Hearing from you in anyway is a comfort.
- Be honest. If the end point for remediation is unknown, say that. Try not to provide estimates based on pure speculation.
- Be present. Not having had a whiff of a utility truck in our area for four days after the event was disheartening. Our neighborhood felt forgotten. Send an ambassador or some sort to give comfort that you exist with a physical presence.
I can’t say enough about the competency of the utilities in solving the myriad of problems when a natural disaster occurs. They do incredible work around the clock. With a few little communication tweaks my personal ratepayer experience would have been so much better.
-
Recent
- Does Innovation Remain at Risk
- AI and the Complex Sale
- The Power Play of ‘Let Me Finish’: Strategies to Foster Open Dialogue
- Navigating Life’s Unkown Journey
- Chief Digital Officer (CDO) The What’s and Who’s
- Digital Transformation:Erecting the House
- Digital Transformation: Real or Marketing Jargon?
- The Price is Right: Cracking the Code of Productivity
- Disaster Communications
- Professional Certifications: Who Cares?
- The Age of the Itinerant Professional
- Wisdom versus Knowledge in the Age of AI
-
Links
-
Archives
- January 2025 (2)
- December 2024 (1)
- November 2024 (3)
- October 2024 (3)
- September 2024 (3)
- August 2024 (4)
- July 2024 (3)
- June 2024 (2)
- May 2024 (5)
- April 2024 (4)
- March 2024 (4)
- February 2024 (2)
-
Categories
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS
